Tell a friend about Pedsource!

[Fwd: Social Marketing and physicans -Reply]

This came across my desk and I had to forward it on:)
Bob

FW: [Fwd: Social Marketing and physicans -Reply]

I'm not sure what this is. It came to my personal email address and I think
that the intention might have been for it to go to the entire list(???).
The "to:" lists an "Alice Marie" - which, unless I have another personality
that I don't yet know about :), isn't me.

Kristin

-----Original Message-----
From: hidden@email-address [mailto:hidden@email-address] On Behalf Of
Bob Pyke Jr
Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 1:52 AM
To: Alice Marie
Subject: [Fwd: Social Marketing and physicans -Reply]

This came across my desk and I had to forward it on:)
Bob

email thingee - FW: [Fwd: Social Marketing and physicans -Repl

Just a quick note on email that can explain this (so everyone on the list
understands):

If Bob was sending his message to Pedtalk, Alice, and 5 other people, he
could put hidden@email-address in the BCC: box on the message. This is Blind
Carbon Copy. The message will look to you like it is really for Alice and
your name won't appear on it.

This is the proper method for sending email to multiple people, ESPECIALLY
to protect other's identity. No one else sees the entire recipient list.

If everyone did this instead of listing 50 names in the To: box, we'd ALL
get a lot less SPAM. This is the #1 way that SPAMmers get names - lots of
peoples email addresses visible in a To: or CC: entry. Try BCC:, you'll
like the results.

PS: this message was sent that way - addressed to Kristin with
hidden@email-address in the BCC: field.

It will probably cause this message to bypass your incoming email filters
if you use them.

Regards,
Danny

At 09:50 AM 5/21/1999 -0400, you wrote:
>I'm not sure what this is. It came to my personal email address and I think
>that the intention might have been for it to go to the entire list(???).
>The "to:" lists an "Alice Marie" - which, unless I have another personality
>that I don't yet know about :), isn't me.
>
>Kristin
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: hidden@email-address [mailto:hidden@email-address] On Behalf Of
>Bob Pyke Jr
>Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 1:52 AM
>To: Alice Marie
>Subject: [Fwd: Social Marketing and physicans -Reply]
>
>
>This came across my desk and I had to forward it on:)
>Bob
>Reply-To: "Louise Roumagoux"
>From: "Louise Roumagoux"
>Sender: "Discussion list on social marketing"
>
>To:
>Subject: Social Marketing and physicans -Reply
>Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 21:08:15 -0400
>Message-ID:
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01BEA36F.5FFBFE00"
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
>X-To: hidden@email-address
>
>There is a broad literature on physician behavior change, including the
>adoption
>of practice guidelines, but I don't know how much of that is based on a
>solid
>social marketing approach. If it's anything like the literature dealing
>with
>interventions to increase immunizations rates among adults, very little.
>There
>is a whole literature on changing physician behavior, including getting
>practice
>guidelines adopted; I'm not familiar with the contents of that literature
>but
>would suspect it also has few, if any interventions, that are developed with
>a
>social marketing approach. One key, at least with the immunizations
>literature
>is that evidence-based reviews look at the strength of the study (design,
>implementation, evaluation); they don't the evidence for the intervention
>being
>use or the strength of that evidence. You probably are already familiar
>with
>intervention-related data bases, but just in case, I copied a list of those
>I'm
>familiar with below. Also, FYI, I also have a (physician) behavior change
>bibliography (not sure how complete it is) which I've attached below. If
>you
>can't open attachments, but would like it, let me know and I'll copy it into
>the
>body of an e-mail.
>
>
>DATABASES FOR INTERVENTION-RELATED LITERATURE SEARCHES
>
>? MEDLINE ? Nursing and Allied Health ? PsycINFO ? Sociofile
>? HealthSTAR ? AHCPR Guidelines ? Best Evidence
>? CANCERLIT ? CHID Online ? Cochrane Library
>? Current Contents ? Social Science Citation Index
>? Anthropological Literature ? EMBASE ? CINAHL ? NTIS
>? SciSEARCH
>
>That said, I'm also very interested in interventions aimed at changing
>physician
>treatment practice/patterns related to specific conditions (especially,
>inpatient care of community-acquired pneumonia) and if anyone has related
>information it would be appreciated.
>
>>>> Joanne Kinder 05/20/99 10:50am >>>
>Has anyone on this listserv used the social marketing approach aimed at
>trying to change medical treatment and referral practices of physicians
>(specifcally internal medicine/primary care docs)? I am specifically
>looking to do some work in the area of interventional cardiology
>procedures. I would be appreciative of any suggestions, advice,
>publications, or programs that you think my be helpful. Thanks!
>
>
>

***************************
Daniel Frieling mailto:hidden@email-address
Pediatric Software Intl., Inc. http://www.compukid.com
CompuKID, The Pediatric Toolkit
Computer software for primary care pediatrics
(800) WELL-CHILD (800-935-5244) Outside the USA: (973) 726-4444
***************************